[ATTACH]
Sorry. I am a little late. Here is an example from my collection. It’s no gem... but it might compare pretty good to yours. [ATTACH]
Okay then. I guess the mint holder is good enough.
It’s not damage! Should I consider getting this one certified?
The last T in ‘ENCHANTMENT’ also looks a little odd to me.
I recently got this 2008-P uncirculated set as a gift. I decided to look for any minor things on them, as that was the best thing to cure my...
Looks normal to me.
Can I see the date? It is supposed to be prominent there. The pictures are a little blurry as well.
Is this implying something?
Not if you sell it on Etsy!
It's a lot bigger than you normally see. Good Find.
It looks like damage. Just to be sure, would you mind posting a close up? Thanks.
FINAL VERDICT: This is an 1878 7 tail feathers 2nd reverse in about XF45-AU53 with a value of around $60.
I'm not familiar with this kind of variety, but I counted 17 berries on the back, so I think you have it.
I don't see any countermarkings. Countermarkings actually bring the value down.
I don't think this is the 7/8 tail feather variety. It would be pretty clear if it were.
It is in about G-04 condition. It is about an $80 coin.
Lamination (which I think this is) doesn't add a whole lot of extra value if it is smaller. Again, this might not be that error, or not an error...
The more and more I look at it, the more and more it looks like an error of some sort. It looks almost like lamination on the hair of the obverse,...
Like I said, I am completely not qualified on my answer. I honestly trust your step dad more than I trust myself.
Separate names with a comma.
