I'm sure the seller is pleased with your (apparent) collusion. :(
Electrotype of a fake?
Shane/G, How can you tell the difference between a "cleaned NT" coin and a "cleaned AT" coin to the extent that you think the AT route is the...
Well said, Mark. I like (and trust) a lot of people, but would buy sight unseen from none of them. ;)
Caught in a coin counting machine or a dryer would be my guesses. I would, however, yield to Cladking and his superior knowledge/experience.
In those situations, I find it valuable to put yourself in the other person's shoes, then decide what YOU think is right. That said, I think it's...
And if you are happy, that's all that counts. :)
Medora, I hear you brother, but do you realize the same logic could be used for third party grading, and I presume you (happily) own slabbed...
AU? Really? I see no luster breaks in the fields and little to no high-point rub. Oddness. Maybe I should stick to grading copper. lol Heck...
Not a 63 or 64? Curious. No way that's a 65. I doubt it's AU either. That leaves 60-62. 62?
I don't necessarily think the first coin is AT, but I do think it was cleaned and has subsequently retoned, which is reason enough to steer clear.
Two lights used in photograph make judging luster difficult. I guessed 66, just because PCGS is very stingy on the 7 grade.
$10 for the coins they sticker. No charge for the ones that don't. Plus shipping (two ways) unless you drop off and/or pick up the coins in NJ.
7r
Sure, rub it in. lol
p.s. yes, I have found my investment in CAC to be worth it. I can go into details if you wish.
A corollary to that might be... "Buy the coin, sell the slab/sticker." ;) :)
Yes to both, IMO.
bingo!
63 because of cheek chatter, but a 64 would not surprise me. Don't think it went PL.
Separate names with a comma.
