Nice, congrats on finishing your collection of halves. But is it cleaned? Looks odd.
Rule number one about coins... NEVER touch the middle of the coin, only hold it by the edges. Holding it improperly could leave fingerprints and...
Theres nothing there IMO
It's a die crack. Not a cud.
DDD, die deterioration doubling. Also a bit of split plating on the reverse. Nothing really. The chances of finding a 1969 - s DDO is insanely low.
I have that problem all the time. Ill find 10 of the same type of atb quarters with only one type of mintmark. And it happens with phli and denver
I think it is a quarter. You didn't specify what you're seeing and even if there is something there it's probably too minor to be worth more than...
Its wear and a weak strike. very common on 1968 dimes, I've seen plenty myself. Keep looking.
I made a spreadsheet with a whole bunch of coins in it. Around 1500 have been put in so far. Although, it will take forever to finish it. I have...
Machine doubling no doubt
:banghead: youre right
I think the OP was thinking that it is a large date and it is an error. It is in fact a large date, and it is much rarer than a small date of the...
The two is flattened a little bit from circulation wear.
Machine doubling
We can hardly see the date. Or the mintmark. Or why you think it is repunched. So I'm going to say no, it's probably not. I have never heard of a...
Everyone saying this isnt an error... Was this posted in error coins? No! The OP is simply posting an optical illusion that makes the coins...
I think it might be a strike through. happens when dirt gets in the die and it is struck on the coin.
Flip the lighting and it would have more of an optical illusion. I don't really see it
Yeah, contact marks. And maybe rolling machine marks. Only worth one cent unless you can find one with no problems at all - no contact marks, no...
I would open one or two maybe. But I'd keep at least one sealed.
Separate names with a comma.
