IMO, the label is good. I have a couple that looks like the color you posted, and these two coins were purchased about 15 yrs ago.
I am 101% sure the coin is no good...;) Although I was offered $1600 for the coin it is not right to sell a counterfeit coin even to dealers.
I show the coin to a couple of guys whom are very knowledgeable in gold. They both said...NG!;)
That's not true...most fakes are made from real gold. I bought the coin for melt when spot gold was $350 and then sold the coin when gold was...
IMO, any coins made after 1963 is consider modern.
I had offers of $1500-$1600 from dealers for this counterfeit $10 Lib. I scratched a big X on both side then sold it for melt. The denticles are...
I knew that's what you guys will think when I made the title..:p
If this is a damage coin then there are a lot of damaged coin in slabs. If you held this coin in your hand I'm sure you will call it a 63...;) I...
delete
I'm not gonna resubmit b/c the difference b/t 62 and 63 is only about $500.I have handled enough gold pieces to know what I am talking about.
A decent MS64 coin.
Bought this better date today. The photos sucks ...the coin looks very nice IRL.
The problem is that they got it wrong the first time.
The MS63 is a very nice coin for the grade, and it should go MS64 easily or even 65 if resubmitted, but the spread b/t 63 and 64 is only $55. The...
This coin is original.
Wish all 62s look like this coin
No you didn't. bullion is still bullion.The only difference today is that MS/PR70 bullion coins contain more BULL than ION.
Don't waste your money on moderns. Classic commem's is so cheap in the past in the past 10 yrs. I like the singles like Grant, Cal, Pilgrims,...
A closer shot of the front.[ATTACH]
I have seen a lot worse scratches on 63 coins out there. The reverse is scratch free.
Separate names with a comma.
