Obviously, I got into this way too late. I was thinking XF45 on the obverse, AU50 or 53 on the reverse, so probably would have gone with AU50....
60 or 61 PL. Pretty ugly (IMO) for an '80-S.
Have you heard of punctuation?
There are so many grammatical and spelling and wrong word usages in what you write that it's really difficult to make any sense of it.
63 PL
I, too, think I detect wear on both the obverse and the high points of the eagle so nice AU58.
65. I'm not a big fan of toning, but your coin is nice.
Y'all must not have seen my last post: PCGS threw the dice and came up 55!
I'm changing my guess to AU55. However, I peeked. I agree with the grade b/c of the obvious wear on the reverse.
It's a PCGS MS65.
I just took pictures of my example that you might like to see.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
AU58, wear on right breast. Maybe FH.
64PL
I was referring to the one I knew little or nothing about grading, but I take your point.
It's painfully obvious that I know little or nothing about grading Feuchtwanger cents. I can see I should have kept my opinion to myself.
I, too, would have given it a 55 b/c of the wear on Liberty's curls.
it's = it is
VF, cleaned
The first two pics make the coin look terrible, which is why I said 61. It looks a lot better in the slab. 64 better? That's another question.
61
Separate names with a comma.
