[img] [img]
Here's one I don't recall posting here: [img] [img]
70's are great...if you make them yourself. If you have to buy them that way, not so much.
One could argue quite the same thing with your "baseless grudge" against PCGS. What did they ever do to you to raise such ire?
I know a few who are millionaires many times over. I know a few who are struggling to make ends meet. Like most vocations, the difference...
Quoted for future reference, and just in case you change your mind. :)
I would argue "never", but rather I'll say that current computer technology does not deal with subjective things like grading very well, so unless...
I voted 65, but was split between 65 and 66. The hit on the cheek is hard to judge and seems to be grade limiting.
Thanks for the clarification, guys. :)
7r
6r is my guess, and I suspect the coin looks a bit better in hand than the closeups suggest.
And the "rightness" goes right back at you. :) However, let's not confuse a lack of a written standard with a lack of consistency. I would...
And a lack of written standard doesn't appear to stop many folks from predicting the grade fairly accurately though, does it? ;)
From the US mint? Unless someone's got a half dime, this one's going to be tough to beat, date-wise..... A chain cent from 1793: [img] [img]...
cast fake continental fakes outnumber the real ones 10 to 1, if I had to guess.
Cleaned and unoriginal, like 99% of trade dollars. Not a terribly bad coin when judged by the typical example you see (probably XF 40 or VF 35...
Please explain how fingerprints on a coin are an indicator of AT from the mint. What am I missing?
LDS 5rb 66rb wouldn't surprise me. I'll bet the luster is much nicer than it appears in the photo.
Argh. But when you draw back and see the coin in the slab photo, it sure has the "look" of a high grade coin. It's also very clean. Certainly...
Separate names with a comma.
