I plan to leave my current job to concentrate on numismatics full time if all goes well.
Agree with 58.
I certainly had fun as the host of the CT Secret Santa for the last few years, but I’m so excited that I get to just participate this year. And...
I’ve definitely seen worse counterfeits, this one isn’t actually that bad. Millions were melted because of the Pittman Act and there are very few...
Am I seeing gifts opened already? You guys are weak. Sending out to my guy this weekend.
Well I voted 65, then scrolled down to see that I was wrong. I should have MR. Woodsrson’ed it.
Looks AU details (polished) to me with these pics.
Nice grab, seems legit time. Honestly, it would’ve very difficult to imitate the surface corrosion to look like it does and I work with exotic...
I’d call it a 66, but wouldn’t argue with a 67 on such a pretty piece either.
I like a bench vice. Put the slab in with the edges against the jaws of the vice and give it a turn. Pops right open.
Common friend A, I’ll tell you, but it wouldn’t be cosher to be out loud about it here. When are you going to be back in Nola? You’ve got to see this.
It felt like the fallout of a recent lawsuit, but it could have been a long time coming. Heritage has also parted ways with a couple after the...
Definitely a cast copy. You can see the seam on the edge.
Some laundry detergents give coins that sort of color when they go through the wash. Looks nice to me though.
No bragging rights for you today. Not a D IMO.
So NGC called the first an AU-55 and the auction company decided to call it a “good very fine” and you agree with the auction company? Good and...
It does, but free advice is even more valuable.
I rescind my comment and agree with your call now that I’m seeing it on my computer.
I wouldn’t.
Looks like a small date to me. The 8 is the giveaway. The top and bottom of the 8 on the large date is very thin.
Separate names with a comma.
