I do have another however that isn't quite as nice. [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
I'd honestly want to see it in person. Those little flecks in the field on the obverse could be nothing or they could be the distracting feature...
Give me half an excuse and I will post even though you've all seen it. [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Matt, that quarter is killer. The reverse is just screaming. I love it.
[IMG] [IMG]
A want list, a loupe, a pile of cash, then I listen to Welcome to the Jungle right before going in...
Blasted with Rust, Red, and Orange this 1961 Proof is still in the original packaging, although it is beginning to deteriorate. [IMG] [IMG]
When you ask someone about condition rarities in the Washington quarter series the easiest one to mention, the one that first comes to mind of...
1830 N-3 with a 150 CW degree rotation on the reverse. [IMG] [IMG]
I've gone through several sets in MS at the $180-200 range. They are fairly common enough because of the overall lack of demand for the entire set.
Honestly its a shot in the dark, photos are unlikely to help, like Kanga said, and the difference between 65 and 66 is so small.
Well, I think he probably held onto the original packaging because the prices for proof sets, especially early ones are those that are original.
three staples, if you must.
nope, I'm gonna own it...you lol and abbreviate too much and language skills atrophy just like anything else.
I have done many a thing to keep people out of my personal space or off the coin tray I was looking at, making your self bigger, spreading your...
A 1904 in F is probably about $15-16 so you're not doing too bad. Besides F and better coins in the barber series seem to be drying up as of late...
Beautiful colors...
ok...as bought on ebay [IMG] as graded by NGC [IMG]
crap I meant surfeit...thats what comes of texting too much.
Separate names with a comma.
