Chances are that your coin is not real. However, it is entirely possible that it is genuine. Is there any way you could post photos of the coin?...
looks like an altered date to me. I would say it is not real.
I'm locking this thread as it seems the situation has been resolved.
au-53 IMO
In hand the coin has super reflective fields, similar to a pl or dmpl morgan. You can read lettering on a business card from several inches away.
NGC graded the coin au-55 star PL. The coin has incredible eye appeal in hand, and I definitely did not do the coin justice with the pictures.
NGC graded. I can't remember the overton number off hand, but it is a common variety.
sorry about the missin obverse. It has been fixed. :)
I haven't done any of these in a while, and I really like this coin, so I thought I would share. :smile:thumb:
au-58 IMO.
It's too hard to tell from the pictures. I would assume proof.
Acetone will not dull the surfaces of a coin, even if you leave it soak for long periods of time. Commercial coin dips like ez-est however will...
There is obvious wear on the cheek and the neck, so I would have to call it au-58. :(
I would call it AU details, but is has been dipped and/or cleaned.
ms-62 IMO.
http://cgi.ebay.com/1804-VF-XF-Draped-Bust-Quarter-a-Real-peach-D1307_W0QQitemZ150200787638QQihZ005QQcategoryZ11963QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZVie...
I agree :high5:
Not to point away from our site, but this thread was recently emailed to me. I have no idea as to the validity of any of it....
I am inclined to call the coin genuine based on the photos. It shows die cracks on the reverse, and I like the overall look. As far as the...
Separate names with a comma.
