Do you have an example of a more extreme mad. Id realy like to see.
Found this to be very interesting. What you think? Enjoy!!!! [ATTACH] [ATTACH] i had one in the past that was more extreme but, i cant find it.
So here it is 1983 P. Nice cud below the bust. I believe it to be CU-1983P-007. This is one of two i will be sharing today. Enjoy!![ATTACH]...
Damaged goods. Machine doubling. It's a spender
Looks like environmental damage. Maybe dug up.
Spend it.
I dont see it. Nice photo!!
Thanks!!! I had to put it in a half dollar 2×2 because it doesn't quite fit a quarter 2×2.
There wasn't alot there this week. This one had to come home with me. Enjoy!!![ATTACH] [ATTACH] What you think guys and gals?
I think the cent is slightly broad struck. Minor but cool I'd keep it.
That is machine doubling. Not a double
Close am friend.
Welcome to the forum friend. I think you have a case of die deterioration. Not a doubled die. Dont give up.
I would agree with die deterioration!
Got a photo of full obverse?
Good eye! Im gonna be on the lookout for one. Cool coin
Show us a pic of the reverse.
Picked this up for $50. I think i got a pretty good deal. Classic head cent for the dansco.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] thanks for looking!!!
We have a winner!!!!! The photo you provided is indeed THE coin in the photo. NO!
Maybe!!! The 9 looks right. You really have to check the die markers. Im not gonna say 100 But, I think its
Separate names with a comma.