So you're stating that you wouldn't count a 1969C with back plate 112 (from way back in the 1957 series) as a mule? No. First, I doubt that...
No. Series 1995 and 2003A $2 notes were printed in FW, and will have the larger back plate serial.
Let me restate that: 1957 they used back plates 1 through 145 (for example) 1957A started at 146 through 205 (again, just an example, not real)....
There are no mules in the $1 Series 1957 SCs, nor in $1 FR notes through 1977A. What exactly are you looking for?
The OP is a great example of why amendments cannot always be interpreted to stand on their own. I am now in deep study of Federal Reserve notes,...
<<PMG certified my note as a mule so I will keep using the word mule. They also put "Silver Cert Back Plate" on the back of the slab.>> And with...
Dursin - I stand corrected in my explanation thanks to you. I was hung up on the plate positions of the notes displayed. No, you cannot...
Kudos to the poster who first identified these as fake - something I even missed! It has nothing to do with the alignment of the serial numbers,...
The better modern series for $5 FRNs are 1969B, 1981A and 1988, but even these only have value in uncirculated condition save for a few scarcer...
If you look at consecutive runs of serial numbers, the next note after an F is nearly always an A, and the next note after an L is nearly always a...
If I can make one recommendation about collecting wide and narrow varieties, it is to learn the plate serials for each design type so you can stop...
It would not surprise me if that note has the slightest, hidden remnant of a center bend, a mark which frequently gets these otherwise CU notes AU...
Separate names with a comma.
