This more than anything else you've said demonstrates that you're not getting my concept. I've heard so often here that wear is wear. The concept...
It's kind of offensive that you assume that because I disagree with you on how something is done that it must be because I am uninformed. I am at...
I've read your explanations about grading history before, and I'm familiar with the origins of the Sheldon scale and its purpose. I believe that...
Yeah I considered that, but how would you tell a new MS62 from an old market graded MS62, etc.? The QXX AU/MS format serves two purposes. First it...
Yes exactly, and great example. I mean you could just call it Q57-70 for simplicity. It's just that no AU coins would in practice grade above Q67...
Not exactly. It's a different quality scale altogether than what we have now. So right now we have 1-58 circulated coins based on wear, 60-70...
I said 57-70 would be MS, single step. That would be 14 grades for UNC. AU would be 50-67, also 14 grades. I don't grade that way either. That's...
Not what I'm saying. I'm saying the AU grades would stop at 55. After that, 57-67 would be a quality scale for both AU and MS coins where wear...
Separate names with a comma.
