Same crap, different toilet paper.
Baltimore show, excuse the horrible pics. The coins are much better in hand. [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] And I picked this up at the PO on the...
My collecting direction has more to do with condition than a certain series. I hold all coins that are as wholesome and problem free as possible...
Yes it is one tough list, and I have no idea how I missed the 1898-O. That has been on my list for a while. I wish I had one 1795 50c let alone...
For me, my Top Ten Coins I would like to acquire in the next few years...All in problem free VF 1) 1893-S 50c 2) 1901-S 50c 3) 1897-O 50c 4)...
No cat coins, but I do think it's time I upgrade to a dog bed. :o [IMG]
Sound advice I recommend.
And some more info! http://blog.davidlawrence.com/index.php/seated-half-dollars-1861-o/
[IMG]
Highly doubt it. A lot of business happening on the obverse.
I'll take a stab, 64 DMPL
In my opinion, I think that 03-O is about the perfect look for a XF half. I think that coin is about a 10 on my eye appeal scale. :yes:
Sorry, I like my coins original as possible regardless of detail. And in all fairness, I answered the original question and not the edited version...
Neither. I'd save my money and buy a problem free example. No matter how long it took. Problem coins are always a problem.
When I first looked at the coin I said 40 details but in a 35 holder because PCGS hates dark coins.
It's part of the numerical number on the slab...XXXX.XX/XXXXXX
You're not the only one that has noticed this. TPG's have been very lax in grading halves. I've see F15's in VF30 holders and XF40's in VF25...
By the way, that's a nice better date coin and looks pretty un-tampered with. One of my favorite date/mm combo's
F15 The reverse is more along the lines of a 20
10c Barber 25c Barber 50c Barber Who cares about the rest.... :D
Separate names with a comma.
