I second DDD.
I opened my mind and my eyes imo it is DDD with a MAD and plating blisters not a cud.Jmo
Imo it appears to be a MAD (misaligned die) let see what others think.
Imo it's not an error there's always a + or - on coins I believe that one is with in tolerance.
This might help you [ATTACH]
Based on your photos I believe your coin has DD ( die deterioration) jmo
Imo it appears to be MD 68's are known for that I have found many of them.
Imo it appears to be a large date here's something that might help you. [ATTACH]
Based on your photos I would have to say DDD ( die deterioration doubling)jmo
Imo environmental damage
Atta boy.lol
Pictures are worth a thousand words. LOL
Based on that photo it appears to be MD.jmo
I don't click links (show us pics).lol
It's considered a grease filled imo I don't believe It would bring any premium.(Face Value)
It appears to be a large date. [ATTACH]
If you are referring to the F and not S IMO I believe that's damage not a mint error.
Imo I would call it a DDD but let see what other's think.
Only the coin would no but if you research the minting process and how the coins are made then you might have a better understanding.jmo
Imo your coin appears to damaged not a mint error.
Separate names with a comma.