I say AU55, for those of you questioning why it's not a MS piece that's cause it has a small trace of wear on the high points and a lack of luster...
Thank you for the info! I don't have a copy of the Brunk catalog so my referencing for counterstamps goes as far as google and NNP can take me....
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Looks good to me, it probably seems suspicious because of the high details + the pores.
Bill is a close friend of mine, I bought two lowball commem halves from him that he didn't put on stacks. Cool to see his lowball set circulating...
It has good eye appeal but I wouldn't pay that much.
Any Ws?
In 1997 New Zealand issued a two dollar coin as it had in past years. Soon after the coin was issued authorities noticed that all 1997 $2 coins...
Not MS or PF, since it's from an enhanced unc set I say SP68
If only it had been in MS/AU condition; beautiful color.
64, 65 and at least a PL for the second.
AU53
And here I was thinking it was already too expensive... I wonder what a 2020 mint set will cost in ten years.
Separate names with a comma.