If you enlarge the images you can see the overall granularity and that the surfaces have been messed with to smooth them out. and the 2 "fang...
I'll guess 66. I just see a few trivial tics. I have the feeling the luster has been thinned a bit from dipping, with some secondary toning on...
I have a few more special ones: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] the monitor token in...
With thanks to Lord M. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
waited a long time to find one of these. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
edge reeding on an 1811 half? uh uh.
great thread and I like the part about why the "fish scale" name was applied to the 3 cent silvers.
I thought the trime would grade at 40; perhaps net graded for the abrasions on the rev. I love the O mints! the nickel 3 cent is a lovely...
grading of course is subjective. I think CoinCorgi's piece has more in common with the F12 on PCGS photograde than with the VF20 example they...
I had to go to one of my old "Rosa Americana Ltd" fixed price catalogs to get some idea of how to grade this coin. Based on the plates and Jeff...
Strike seems pretty decent. I would think 58 due to the gray strip down Liberty's left side.
Looks like a nice original Fine to me.
Whoops. I'd still like to see photos, that is a tough date/MM.
62? way to go. great looking coin.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Some really, really nice coins here. Beauties, and...
a very clean coin I'll guess 67.
I'll guess MS 64.
I call it choice AU and beautiful!
Beautiful coins, I love that chocolate brown color. well done, Eduard!
Separate names with a comma.