I went 66, would have went higher but the luster looks impaired in some way.....
Ms-67 RD
Yes, it was a joke, I do not endorse bribery whatsoever. But they are crooks(IMO) who work in politics for money.
Probably get you further with those nut-heads.
I mentioned the price for making a machine that accepts both halves and $2 bills as well as dispences them, yes.
You can say that again.
lol
By all means, CLEAN IT UP!!! Show us an after picture too:yes: 3 more to 100!!! (The like jloring has given to this post)
Not if done correctly, but get a little over zealous and you have a ruined coin.
I second that, but I will add that it is a strong G-4, and has nice details except the lack of "we".
The movement of the Mintmarks you mentioned in the Roll Searchers thread, is explained by the lack of technology. During the time the mms were...
BINGO!!!! That's what he meant, variety and varieties, not veritity or however you had it.;)
[ATTACH] This suits you I think lol
John... Where do you get these weird pictures??! lol
Not me buying the vending machine lol I am not the OP!!!! ROFLMAO
The problem with these, to be frank....nobody wants them. So it's hard to go about pricing them, I think selling this is like a coin-flip, you can...
We'll know the answer soon... I have emailed a consultant for "Seaga" a vending machine manufacturer.
Correction: The condition of your coin is "proof".
Nice, congrats, I've been looking for a 19th century AU/UC IHC for a type set.
I'll be looking forward to it.
Separate names with a comma.