This strays from my usual Tip because it is R2+ and rather common. But it is mislabeled and if you want to pick up a 1794 for 1795 prices, it may...
This is a misattributed coin labeled as a 1798 style one hair. A glance at the reverse immediately shows a Reverse of 94 and just a little work...
This is a low grade example of what I believe to be an S-143 R5. Because of wear, it is moderate confidence and some will consider it...
This one is about to expire so hurry! This is a 1796 S-116 (R5) variety. There appears to be good detail and a bit of condition issues, but it's...
This is NOT a high confidence item, but I list it as an item of interest. It is easily identified as reverse C which would normally narrow it down...
This is a worn, but nice 1796 Draped Bust. It is one of the Reverse U bunch. I've identified it as Obverse 20 from the position of the date and...
This is a poor, but rare variety S-111 (R5-) with a moderate confidence factor due strictly from wear. Position of the 1 and 6 relative to the...
OK Guys. This one is a little different. I went through three phases on this one. First phase. Bleh! Second phase. Really excited and...
This is a nice coin going for only $15.50 as I type. It is an unattributed S-146 R5. A key for identification of Reverse C is the imbedded berry...
OK! I can't attribute this one because I don't have the Half Cent references. But it is definitely a Half Cent. If it is a 1796, it would be very...
This is a Heritage Auction with an unattributed 1796 Liberty Cap. This is unusual in itself, but I believe there is sufficient detail to attribute...
Well I've been playing with Large Cent bids on Heritage. I shouldn't win any bids, but I spread out my bids on the off chance a coin or two falls...
This is posted on Heritage as a future item which is anticipated after further research. It is a particularly unusual high grade example. The only...
I decided to extract his from the ugly designs thread to see if anyone else had ideas they could illustrate on new, better coin designs. Here is...
I notified the seller of his mistake including identifying it as a draped bust obverse and Reverse of 1797 Reverse. Usually a seller is...
Since I recently acquired a coin which was misattributed by PCGS, I thought I'd pass along this information to help novices and PCGS out. (coins...
This is a S-154 R4+ (76-117 est.) with some corrosion issues but otherwise undamaged....
This is a S-171 R4+ (76-117 est.) with nice surfaces and an in-your-face rim break. I see no evidence of reverse breaks, so I'd say about Die...
This is an unattributed S-168 which is only R3, but appears to be a rare die state I (both I {Clapp 22-Eb} and II {Clapp 22-Ec} were unseen by...
This is a mislabeled PCGS holder indicating a Reverse of 94 when it is a Reverse of 97. It is unattributed, but the reverse is easily identifiable...
Separate names with a comma.
