I was comparing it to past sales of the variety on Heritage. But you could just have better photos. It helps not being imaged through plastic.
It's probably worth sending in for authentication. The stars are so sharp it actually make me suspicious. If Authentic, it has the sharpest detail...
Here's mine.[ATTACH] I had forgotten I already had this one. Now if I could just replace my obverse with this obverse while I keep my reverse......
I can't see anything wrong with it. S-161 Noyes Die States D/J. This is a superior example of the terminal die state than the X/J in Noyes. If I...
If it is an impaired PROOF, even with the carbon spots it is a valuable coin. But I have no idea how you can determine that. The proofs in those...
Perhaps you can explain to me how this was determined to have larger letters than the rest. I can't see a difference other than spacing like the rest.
I will return, but I've suddenly lost my ability to concentrate.
GOT IT RIGHT! I was initially confused by the wide and narrow gaps between the words that usually indicted LL or SL on other series. But it was...
The reverse of 99 HUB attempts make the last half of 98 through 1800 challenging, but for the most part, you are correct.
Looks small to me. Confusing though because the first small letters I pulled up (labeled O-105) definitely has large letters. Looks like O-106...
I was about to chastise you for skipping 2015 berfore I realized the 2015 Presidential is dated on the edge.
It is not economical to attribute the borderline copper as a business. It's like buying a lottery ticket. It's not good business after accounting...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] This one gets two COMPs. The first I just added and is the finest known at EAC VG10 and in Die State I. The other COMP is...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] 1. E slightly too far left. 2. R slightly too far left and rotated clockwise. 3. T slightly left and higher than Comp 5. 4. Date...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] 1. IB too far apart 2. R too far right - Clockwise rotation. 3. T too high. 4. Date too thin. 5. Second 0 too low. Confidence...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] 1. Spacing almost a match. But Bottom of T above tail of R. 2. T slightly left of Comp 3. 3. Date almost a match, but thinner...
[ATTACH][ATTACH] Comparisons Subject to COMP order 1. T too far left 2. R too far left 3. BE too far apart 4. LI too far apart Subject has wider...
Maybe I can make this more definitive this time by going through each of the 19 known obverses and showing why they are excluded and with what...
I'm back on the confirmation trail of this "1800 NC-2" that I started about 4 years ago after a thread about a frustrating attribution of a 1809...
Now you've gone and done it. Back on the trail again. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] I'll move it back to the Attribute This thread....
Separate names with a comma.
