Thank you for your post... I see you had it graded. In your opinion, do you think I should have this 2003 proof quarter graded also? I don't know...
the quarter is from my 2004 silver quarter proof set, so I was curious as to what caused these damages from the mint...
I went thru my brother's pocket change and found this... I believe this is listed as Wexler WDDO-001
the first image shows what looks like rim lettering... the second is the full reverse.
The photos may not show the bronze color as I see it, but the coin on the left has a bronze or light gold color. I did soak it in acetone to see...
I took these two this morning from different angles...
While looking through my Cumberland Gap quarters, I found these different images...
not sure what's going on here... any help?
I found this in my 2003 proof set of quarters... looks like an underground tunnel[ATTACH]
the year is 788 and the bottom of the tower is also filled in with grease...
I have to post again... I aligned the date and Liberty to another 44 cent, and they line up! I don't know why they look different on this post,...
(The Liberty and date don't seem to be parallel)... What would cause this, and what does the reverse look like?
soft and bendable? hmmm... I'm trying to think of how many soft and bendable coins I have had in my life...
nice clash What causes a double line in a clash?
I took the information and compared the two...
I copied the D mintmark and placed it in the area you believe it could have been re-punched. The first image is your original. The second image is...
Please read desertgem's reply...
Denver post I took your first image to overlay, I believe to be from Denver mint... only very slight difference.
compare I wanted to compare the first seven to the second one.
What I first noticed on the reverse, was the die chip on the L. Then I thought the E might be doubled along with the U and R. Now I'm pretty sure...
Separate names with a comma.
