first one looks like a S/D, second looks like a L/D. Go to www.lincolncentresource.com for the Small/Large Date variations.
yes there are small/large date proof's..that picture is hard to tell if it is hard whether or not it is small/large date
Au53 nice looking coin RLM!
Even with a few blemishes that it is worthy of a 67.
I could be wrong though struck through debri is not PMD it is a mint error
First looks like a lamination error and the second is a cud..both nice and keepers imho. Not worth much but still cool
Good call on the corrosion RLM. When I was reading your comment I had to do a double take.
qualities of a 66 but think its a 65
probably got 65 because it is a woodie, however I think this is deserving of a 66.
My thoughts..you have two clipped cents..congrats
looks flat shelf like doubling so with that in mind I am thinking it is Machine Doubling not a true DDR. Sorry
They have both a uncirc (which depending on the year can be a satin finish or a Business strike finish) and proof sets.. I don't have any pictures...
No not necessarily, condition is key, it also depends on whether or it's an RPM, DDO, MD etc.. I would hghly recommend getting numismatic books to...
no need to create 2 posts, it could be from an uncirc set, it could be from a grade school science experience..it's hard to say without pictures...
the one you showed is a small date, if they are all small dates then I can imagine it be worth a pretty penny..get it :)
67
Probably a 66 but gibven it a 65
Going to say no it's not. http://www.lincolncentresource.com/Featured/1988RDV6.html
FYI, you can only edit a thread so many times. Thanks for the contest 1
79-CC: cleaned but still worth more than melt. Going off of Numismedia (which may be outdated so the price may not be accurate) if that coin wasnt...
Separate names with a comma.
