Gemmy! 65
MS65?
64?
F15, great look!
I'd say going the extra mile for the cheesecake more than makes up for time frittered away on a coin forum, Publius2. The coin looks overly...
Lots of cheek chatter, left field too. I think 60 to 61, but Morgans aren't my thing.
The good thing about having a good eye and buying nice coins is that they are a source of funds for other collecting ventures and will sell...
Great looking coins. Your experience certainly highlights the uncertainties and subjectivity inherent in the grading process.
I missed this excellent thread the first time around. glad it was bumped. Very informative and an interesting sub-collection within the CWT's
More information is always better. Nice research. What die do you think you have? Now I'm thinking die 1 instead of die 4. If the die...
I do think that combining the information on the die rotation with the mintmark position and apperance should be enough to establish authenticity,...
I have one of those, too. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I really like the Bode tokens. Here is a good thread about those and Mr. Bode himself. My example is posted about halfway down the thread....
The image that John Burgess cites I can't find on my computer; I think I copied it from a post on the CU forum years ago. The die rotation info...
I found this image of the 4 mintmark positions on my external hard drive: [ATTACH]
Not much to add, but when I looked at the rev closeups I could see that the plant details were very granular and consistent with a transfer die fake.
Thanks, Publius2. I'll refer to it as the "mute eagle" variety.
I see. the 2 in 25 is low.
Hmm, think I have one too, my lone "late" bust quarter [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
