and , like i said it is the whole profile
yes, like the machine doubling
the 38 and 39 are r * b, the 52 red
cannot steal the pictures due to ebay copyrite, tried to will not post, sorry
the 1952 has a die crack on both sides, but is a proof...so, 29.00 for him, just wondering if worth it fo the novelty
hello, currently looking to buy it now on a 1939 proof Lincoln cent that is machine doubled, on front portrait of Lincoln total and on cent and...
a little late now, they are in 2 x 2 cardboard flips and in my album of errors, all did not appear to be ground, most had blakesly affect, or...
yup, and thanks...i love errors..i buy and sell normal coins..(that is once shows or flea markets open again, that is)..but the errors i do not...
time to bid on more errors
bought them from a reputable dealer on ebay : ERRORAUCTIONS
everyone always wants front and back, and BETTER pictures, so, just nipped it in the bud..lol
forgot this one, made slight mistake posting..sorry[ATTACH]
1970-d au-dd, also rr rim reverse, 1975 au-50, 1984-p au-53, 1971-d vf-20, 1969-d xf-45, 1974-d xf-45, 1972 vf-20, 1978-d au-55[ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
66
ms-64 bn, imho
and finally[ATTACH] [ATTACH] ..a 1944 canadian nickel, with die cracks on reverse and lamination defects
and an 1857 bank of upper canada 1/2 penny token[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
and an 1854 bank of upper canada 1/[ATTACH] [ATTACH] 2 penny token
an au large cent 1913 i picked up at auction this week[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
just going by their description..thanks for the true description
Separate names with a comma.
