Post mint damage. Probably hit with a hammer with another coin under it. IMHO.
Un huh
What? They’re not errors? Dang, I just found this one too![ATTACH]
It looks like PMD. Post mint damage. It’s probably an end coin from a roll damaged by the roll crimper.
You are correct. The best way I can tell the difference quickly is the loop of the 9 is tighter and the tail of the 7 is level at the top and...
It appears to be mechanical doubling from a worn die. I can’t see any notching in the letters or the date IMHO. A pic of the full obverse and...
LOL, I thought I was the only one that got caught with their pants down!! Nice to know I’m in good company.
Sorry, I’m new here. 1859 was the first IHC making it 160 years old. BTW 1908 was the first year of San Francisco mints.
Separate names with a comma.
