If it's PMD, the edges of the pit should be raised. If not then I think a strike through, as KBBPLL wrote. Planchet flaws, in my limited...
Great coins ,Larry, that 66-s is a tough low mintage date, variety F101 or 102? R4 or R5. [IMG][IMG][IMG][IMG]
NIce!
fun overdate: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Don't think I've seen a gold toned one before ,thanks for posting it.
Beautiful coin, Larry! wish I had a draped half that looks nearly as nice. Nice one, Eduard, those 1801-1803 are really tough. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I'll guess 15,500 all in.
1500 seems steep to me. My raw one (which I think is about VG10, polished) has a bit more detail, I value at around 1,000 (not trying to hijack...
I plunged into the Heritage Archives, went back as far as 10/2018 looking at MS 75-S, found 2 with extensive dentil pitting like the coin in the...
This coin is really bugging me because the surfaces aren't like anything I've seen before. I don't think it's die wear causing the micropitting,...
If the obv has luster like the rev, 58. If not, 55.
It seems the Paypal protection plan worked. Good! If you paid with a cc that offers an additional layer of protection. I will add that from...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I don't think I can conclude but so much from these photos. Luster could be anywhere from 55 to MS, if MS marks and probably dipping would keep...
Yes, graded 45. good eyes! the other one is a F15.
Congrats, cooper, that's a great looking coin! here is one of my 74-cc wide cc's, not sure how I wound up with 2 of them. [IMG][IMG]
sharp eyes, and a great pickup. Man if it could talk!
The edge reeding looks ok to me.
Nice research, also I see the lump on the L. The surface texture is very similar and not something I was familiar with , so now I am somewhat...
Do you have a closeup of some edge reeding? What I don't like so far is the odd texture overall, sort of "micro-pebbly," especially on the rev...
Separate names with a comma.
