Unfortunately no. Look at the 6 in 65. The profile of the 6 would be totally showing, not just the loop.
You are correct on the first doubling, the second is MD, mechanical doubling. This can explain it. http://doubleddie.com/144822.html
It’s damage. PMD, it took a hit sometime during it’s life.
I think you might have meant CAM. WAM’s were proof strikes only.;)
It appears to be DDD. Die deterioration doubling. Read this, it should help. http://doubleddie.com/144801.html
Looks good!
Environmental damage. Looks like it might have been exposed to some type of acid.
It’s PMD. Post mint damage.
From your pictures it appears to be a die scratch.
You have a heavily worn cent that has been struck or pressed on top of another cent. All post mint damage. PMD. You can tell because the letters...
It looks like you have a cent stuck by worn dies and may have split the plating. Circulation wear made it worse exposing the zinc. There is no...
No, that coin is severely damaged. It looks like it’s be burnt and/or exposed to some type of acid.
I found a few in that bag but I can’t remember how many. I’ve slept too much since then.;)
I hate to hear that. They are three piece but I found it worked good if I took my phone case off. I had a hard time with it with my case on.
I really didn’t get this coin in change, I got it in a vinyl queen size comforter bag full of pennies a customer gave me for a tip for fixing her...
That’s a die chip in the 9 of the date. Lamination on the bust. Nice.
In my never ending quest to compile a complete LMC RPM collection I’m finding it harder to properly attribute some of the minor RPMs. There are...
Not necessarily, it depends upon where the debris builds up at. It doesn’t have to be at the lowest part of the die.
I’m not seeing it either. It should look like this. [ATTACH]
Probably grease or debris filled die.
Separate names with a comma.
