sorry, it's in the bank. I was referencing the edge photo in my fake trade dollar thread.
here's an AU example to compare: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
seriously underweight, which completely disqualifies a lightly circulated coin imo. also, edge reeding does not look correct; and the rev...
I immediately zoomed in on the weak dentils and and didn't check the rev die type. My bad. the 78CC with type 1 rev is a very commonly...
21-s looks F15 to me; please let us know the grades!
"O" as in OMG! Here's a real one: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1859 is a lower mintage issue with most exported to China; as such it is very scarce in all grades which makes me immediately suspicious of this...
Nice one , Lord M!
here's one of mine lower grade to compare[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It's fake. AU ish details but dentils absent on most of the rev. Liberty's figure is not very well excecuted.
I'd give about F15. I think it's probably genuine but couldn't be sure without larger pics. Generally, you don't see counterfeits of well worn...
Nice illustration Paddy54!
Reported. Egregious fraud.
That's a heck of a set you are building! All beauties!
I thought this was a very good quiz. Thanks, Insider.
I'm thinking around xf45 to au50; hard to tell on a coin with such a weak strike. I like the look, though.
my experience has been that the less wear on the coin, the less accurate are attempts to grade from photos. With that in mind, I think the IHC...
looks like it's gone.. nice work!
Thanks for the chance, Lord M.! If I win I would like the Clau..Clau..Claudius Roman coin.
I think it's post-mint damage.
Separate names with a comma.
