Welcome to CT. You need to post full, clear, cropped pictures of both obverse and reverse on your coin and a close up of any areas of question....
Pictures?
I stand corrected! I forgot Denver set up it’s die shop up in 1996.
http://www.error-ref.com/subsurface-corrosion/
Master dies were shipped to Denver from Philly at that time and Denver made working dies for themselves and San Francisco. San Francisco finished...
That’s a very nice looking small date. I really can’t tell if there’s anything going on with it because of the glare. There are several different...
I would tend to agree with you but the MD in the 9 and 2 of the date is NE, same as the mint mark. Also the RPM—001 is from a doubled master die...
First welcome to CT. Unfortunately that’s not a RPM it’s mechanical doubling (MD). You can see it in the date also. Flat shelflike with reduction...
First, welcome to CT. You need to start your own thread to get better responses. Post full, clear pictures of both obverse and reverse with close...
I’m leaning to a counterfeit because the T and the U in trust have a strange spacing and appear tilted. The reverse also has E Pluribus UNUM...
Pictures are needed to see condition and possibly authenticity if it’s not graded.
MS 64 FS. The “smear” on the right of Monticello would keep it from 65 for me.
The 45 appears to be PMD, the 88 is a slight misaligned die strike MAD on the obverse and looks like a scratch on the reverse. The 98 appears to...
Your pictures don’t show it to be black. It appears to be a well worn and maybe 1927. Environmental toning and circulation will make them look...
I’m with @paddyman98, “cograts”! Nice coin!
Thanks, all I see is a slight misaligned die strike (MAD). Fairly common on dimes.
Welcome to CT. Can we see a picture of the reverse?
No, the ear took a hit. PMD
Unfortunately no. Circulation wear and damage. http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/1983DDDO001.htm
FS 102
Separate names with a comma.
