It appears to be environmental also with wear. No errors I can see. JMHO
My name is Dan, please feel free to call me that. You are welcome! I enjoy your posts.
Definitely environmental damage. Sorry :(
Easy now. I’m also bald:shame:
X3
Environmental damage.
It’s not large date it LL, large letters.
Very nice. X2 on VF35
I can see it good now. Thanks for the pictures!
That’s what I thought but wasn’t sure if was just a reflection in the picture.
That’s neat. To have the same issue from different mints really makes it look like it may be a weak area of the dies with that design.
Please do!
You might contact him and send him some pictures. He’s a nice guy.
I am looking at the whole reverse. By the pictures it appears to have MD at the top of the E in United and on the NT in Cent. Now that’s not to...
It is a proof coin.
Small date is for the San Francisco minted cents in 1970. The reverse has MD.
Well, you need swear it’s a 32-D then!!
The 1969-S is almost FS. It makes me think it may be proof dies. The only thing that makes me wonder if its not is 1969-S dimes were only struck...
I don’t know who said I know a lot, but they lied to you:(! Have a good night. I enjoy your coins.
The 2009-D with the same crack is interesting. I wonder if that’s a weak spot? I couldn’t tell exactly from 2009 if it was a match. Is it?
Separate names with a comma.
