Th OP’s coin shows polish lines from cleaning, DDD and split plate doubling especially in Trust. Could this also be from: ?...
64
It’s not a doubled die it’s mechanical doubling. Flat and shelflike.
Nice lamination error. You can read up on it here: http://www.error-ref.com/retained-lamination/
I would check for die markers on VV, CC and Wexlers. They sometimes have different markers and die stages listed.
Good question. Typically extra thickness is accompanied by notching in the letters or devices or it can look like “tootsie roll” script. The...
If so, it’s a 003 stage C. Plus the doubling in the O of God looks like the 003 to me.
Are those die scratches running SE from the G?
A buck or two. Nice raw examples can be purchased for $10.
X2
No, not DDO-002. That variety has ODV-031, yours appears to be ODV-030....
Even if they are low MS you might check for FT: http://www.smalldollars.com/dollar/add017.html
A 1999 CAM is normal for a business strike. Here’s a good source for WAM’s and CAM’s: http://www.lincolncentresource.com/wideams.html
Wish I had a 1999 and 2000! All I ever find down here is 1998 and they are usually in poor condition.
It appears to be a scratch on the obverse. I don’t see any doubling on the reverse.
Very nice. Appears to be delamination before strike.
Nice example. I believe the 1999 is the rarest followed by 98 leaving the 2000 being the most common in the 98-00 series.
It’s plating blisters, common on copper plated zinc cents.
Bryan, the first coin you posted has mechanical doubling which is fairly common and has no added value or NAV. I really can’t tell much from the...
I’m guessing MD, mechanical doubling.
Separate names with a comma.
