Double Standards
Way to go Shiela !!!!!
I like the proofs just for their looks , as for 69 and 70s , true some 70's are 69s but if you really start to look grab a few 70s and 69s and...
Really like your S/S Walker !
The last set were you said how how accurate to in hand appearence they are . Nice '10-S .
Basically trying to be nice , and yes I do like a couple of your rounds for what they are . But to tell the honest truth , I think my last post is...
Hope to see the results from you're horde coins !
I'm with Books on this . To tell the truth Mr.Carr your best work is the work I've seen done by Junior College art students and the reason I say...
Nice , looks like a 65 to me , but you have her in hand so you would know .
It's good to ask questions , sometimes I ask the simplest questions and I've been at this off and on since the early '60s .
64 and 64 , I don't do VAMS . I'll eat my shoes if the '02 is AU , no way with those clean fields .
Hard to teach doubling from one exaple unless it's extreme like a 1955 DD , some MD looks almost like Doubled Die coins and vica versa . I'd say...
Hard Time Tokens Paddy !
Though on further review it looks relatively clean for a Morgan and has blazing luster , though I doubt it's an 1892 , lol more like a 1902 . A 64...
TPG grade 64 , my grade 63 .
Can anyone say VAM and I don't even collect Morgans or Vams other than a few I find interesting . Sure looks good to me !!!!!
Nice write up . Man I need a CC Trade dollar .
That's one well hammered Bustie ! Hows the luster on her ?
They're probably magnified by the pics .
Looks like a cleaned 45 to me , but with today's tpgs a 50 is possible which to me is a shame . Looks like it has some hairlines too .
Separate names with a comma.
