I went 65 on it with just a quick look without putting too much thought into it.
Counterfeit. Graded AU53 by PCGS. Die gouge on the first T of TRUST is another die marker for this counterfeit.
I voted 65. I thought the marks would keep it from premium gem but if they are not as distracting in hand with the luster booming like it seems a...
Does it surprise me that a mid circulated key date half from the teens commends a premium? It does not surprise me. If the price is too high for...
Definitely choice. Red at that. :woot:
$30. I’d rather have a steak dinner with a strong drink. Looks AT and not attractive.
I went 65. I am thinking the marks are not as significant nor distracting in hand. I think luster and eye appeal carried this one over the strike...
I was 3/4 and the only coin I missed was influenced by a price guide. Shame on me. I graded the coin based on the price I felt it would bring to...
$65
I was at 64 but I am thinking the luster is blazing on this one and makes up for the few marks scattered throughout. I’m calling it a 65...
The two photos definitely show the coin in different ways. With the price jump from 64 to 65 I am calling this a high end 64. Probably CAC. My...
Clean fields, what seems to be a solid strike. Luster subdued by the toning which screams originality. I went 65.
Looks too dipped out for my taste. Luster on obverse reads sort of flat for me. Strike seems soft on the leaves and back of the cap. Few scuffs on...
$600
No. Just no. $3,500 is my guess.
I went 67 which was just my initial gut feeling of the coin without studying it too much.
You never cease to amaze us. Awesome pick up with a neat story.
Avatar coin. PCGS plate coin. Top pop. Neon rainbows. Let’s shoot for the moon and say $2k flat.
Cool die cracks. They seem to go around the entire obverse devices. I went 64 on it.
The scattered hits in the field look like those that would come from circulating. I can’t pick out the wear on it exactly so I went 63. Some of...
Separate names with a comma.
