I know there are a few threads around about the coin shortage but this one is a bit different. [ATTACH] About 2 weeks ago several cities started...
Nice. Very original and crusty look with good eye appeal. 65.
Proofs don’t qualify for the FSB designation.
PR66 Not going to trick me this time.
First one is a 3 for me. The reverse lacks a good flow of color progression. The second is a 5 for me. Right on par with the Battle Creek shown...
I prefer the 1881. I feel the overall eye appeal is much better. I also think it has a slight cameo contrast. I think the 1894 would appeal to...
Nice idea for a thread @ddddd. I would have said 3 for the first coin. The toning is very attractive but more luster would have moved it into 4...
63
CAC
58
@JCro57 has several of these that he sent to ICG to have graded. He also has a 1939 that I am sure he would love to show here. You don't see off...
Here are my two Hennings. One with the looped R and one without. The die mark for the non looped R is a tiny circle die chip above the building....
Little hard to see the steps on the reverse but I think they are there. 66FS
PF65+ CAC
Very nice. Love the look of these early proofs. The reverse almost looks cameo. I noticed you didn't reveal the grade. I am thinking 66.
62
66
No CAC.
Happy birthday Sir! Time to break out those cubes and that green Secret Santa scotch! :woot:
Separate names with a comma.
