I am at a 6 for sure. I also wonder if this coin has been to CAC and didn’t sticker. It seems a coin of it’s stature would have been on the desk...
4.5 for me
Me as well with 2 Morgan’s that I can double down on. Then I may have to dig something out that isn’t a Morgan as I know they bore some of the group.
Thanks for the opinions. I thought this one was interesting as the Ike came in a bit higher than I had it and the Morgan slightly lower. I agree...
61
Very nice coin. Even as a 69, * or not the coin speaks for itself. Sweet pick up!
I added the reverses. I had not included them because the lighting was a bit different but I included them at the request to get a feel for both...
Let’s see what you think. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I am at a 5 on the Morgan. I think it being a 64 to me limits it from being a 6 due to the luster and how the colors prolly show in hand. I have...
Can I hop in line to post one?
Three for me.
1.5
The grade just confirms my decision of #2. As a 66 it has to have great luster so I am sure this is a nice looking coin in hand.
I like number 2 better. The overall strike seems a bit weaker but I think the steps look better. It also has the toning and eye appeal going for...
:cigar:
The only other thing I see/know is that it appears to be the only Hudson doily making it one of a kind. According to the census only 79 reported...
The doily is missing the stacking ring.
The holder is counterfeit.
This is a high end 3 for me. If this coin was completely blue and was a PL example it may push into 4 territory for me. I think the splotchy...
Solid 4 on the dime. I would have said 5 on the Morgan as well.
Separate names with a comma.
