4 for me. Unique toning color. I also love textile toners and not all of them have great eye appeal. This one certainly does.
Go stars!!
4.8
No freakin’ way. Congrats again man. Now off to CAC!
I have two easy solutions for you. I recommend the first one. 1- send coins to me 2- buy a second safe :D
At least put it all in a safe. :woot:
:cigar: I’d like it even more as a 67+* Don’t take away the fact that it’s at the high end of the grade but let’s instead add to the fact that...
67+ Barely misses the FS designation. With that it’s easily a top pop coin.
66CAM
66+ Bridging steps under column 3.
67FS. If I remember correctly any marks that are on the planchet that don’t fully strike out are not penalized for step destination. Hope I am...
5 for me.
It doesn’t bother me but the consensus with my star Morgan shown earlier was that it was below a 3 and it has a much better spectrum of color than...
4 for me. Very original mint set toning. A little splotchy but sometimes that’s how they come.
67FS 67 I believe the first coin is a FS for sure but the second coin appears to have some bridging of the steps between columns 2 and 3....
I had this one at a 3 as well. Would be nice if the obverse was a bit more eye appealing.
Edited to add
This ones interesting as it appears to have textile toning on the obverse and the reverse. NGC 63 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That is a very good point. Buying a 66 as grey sheet sight unseen and this one shows up in the mailbox. :woot::cigar:
If I am putting $20,000 on the line for a coin, I would like to know a separate well respected party would confirm it as solid for the grade. For...
Separate names with a comma.
