#3 was my vote. #1 67 I don’t think they penalized it for the reverse hit #2 66 too many contact marks for 67 #3 66+ FS I think the luster just...
I went 66. Few scuffs on the reverse under Monticello and that red dot kept it from 67 for me.
That brings back memories. I looked at the coins briefly and graded them as I always do. Scrolled down to the bottom of page 1 to post my...
Long day at work and at the pool hall after. Totally missed this one. I had the first at 65FS only because the hit on the cheek. Coin 2 I had at...
I think both 52's are more than worthy of a star. The real question that remains - will the 67 take place in your registry?
[ATTACH]
Nice crusty and original. 65
I wanted to give it a 66+* but that seems ridiculous. 67* :cigar:
Glad to see this one back up. Thanks @ddddd for the tag. 1945-S Nickel....1 (terminal) 1963-D Cent....1 (lacks eye appeal) 1795 Dollar...3...
Professional Cricket Grading Service :woot:
62
Nice upgrade on this one!
63* to 63. I am guessing you wanted 64 from PCGS and they kept it at 63 because of the muted luster.
Just missed this one. I would have guessed 58 to 63.
64 old 64 new
64 CAC original 65 new
Separate names with a comma.