If she welcomed you to do so, you should only have posted the link . . . no photo, phone number or email address.
First, get a couple of quotes from reputable insurers. Then, pretend someone broke into your home or your SDB and took your collection. You'll...
No question . . . altered surfaces.
;)That's so good, I wish I'd thought of it. But you shouldv'e saved it for April . . .
Goes back to the answer given to question 1 by @Lehigh96 . . . liquidity.
I think the only thing that really endangers this hobby, or any other, is unfair profit.
The coin sports nicer color than my photos reveal.
Oh please yourself . . . why didn't you answer the questions? Is your time too valuable?
Agreed Skip . . . I gave it the time for good reason
7 1 5 . . . I typically don't send coins in unless (1) they are worth $300 or more, (2) they are widely counterfeited, or (3) the value jumps...
50
The coin was not weakly struck. Rather, the planchet was non-uniform in thickness. While not the perfection one would want to buy for the asking...
The coins went off to CAC this afternoon. I'll post results when I get them . . . likely more than a month down the road.
Actually, Paddy, I think it is one of the lesser-prized varieties. It's been a very long time since I studied it, but I recall hoping it was one...
That’s a Teletrade coin from the days when there were no photos to look at.
Ditto . . . this has always worked well for me.
The 1897-O is not a well struck date, and it's often pretty scuffy. It's difficult to tell from the photos of the coin has been cleaned in the...
You're correct about the P/L tendencies. I couldn't pick it up well in the photos because of glare from the holder.
Holder.
Sorry CPM. It didn't occur to me that Recent Topics would get polluted with my threads. I suppose I should have taken the time to release the...
Separate names with a comma.
