yes
Good thing they were blurry cause I dont think i could handle seeing that mug any clearer.:p:D good job Frank
When you eat the worm thats in a bottle of Mescal you don't need a microscope, you see alot of things
Simple solution priority box, then we don't have to hear how a coin got lost or stolen from a ripped open bubble mailed.
Most likely because it would be considered a variety
For David http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/composite.aspx?c=988 On this set its either small or large motto
For Chuck http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/composite.aspx?c=1902
IIRC there is CC gold in GSA holders also
[MEDIA] Geekpryde is actually Scrooge McDuck, he was swimming in his ocean of gold
Hello Burro, My name is Doug and I've been collecting for 25 years+, and the sickness doesn't go away:angelic:
he quoted Tommy not you so I would guess he wanted a picture of Tommy's coin in question
$335 The lack of reverse color holds it back along with its not target toning
No just the 64
How much would you have paid for that coin ?
Because there is a sucker born every minute. If one can produce a piece for 75 cents and sell it for $10 or whatever you paid for it is easy money.
Beat me to it
For a 63 the cheek is cleaner than most and with the dmpl $450 is a good price
Where did I say cleaned? has it been messed with Imo yes. Even after seeing the ICG slab my opinion stays the same. Remember , whether a proper...
Au details, I wouldn't pay anything for it as the spot on face is distacting Edit, I see Mike has same opinion
Original post
Separate names with a comma.
