Not a doubled die
I don't see die cracks on either side.
Could be a few reasons why it's only 2.8 grams instead of 3.1 or 3.2, but in any case, without a doubt, your photo is of a plated 1975-D Cent.
Not that anyone cares today, but that 1950-P BIE is one of the scarcer dates, imo
A much better than average example
Die Crack For some reason 2007 Dimes have lots of die cracks, split dies, etc.
Not finning - I can't tell if it's just extra schmootzem - hard to tell from the photo because that 'stuff' looks much lighter than the coins...
It's a 'hit' or small contact mark from the coin being in circulation.....that's it.
There is no other strike on or under that quarter, sorry. As mentioned, Numismatic Pareidolia -
In the general area of coins, Wide AM's, (for example) are called errors; collectors of them (and other varieties) call them Die Varieties, which...
Damaged, I'm sorry to say. The obverse has been 'machined'/beveled.
Damage from a counting machine. It's also called a 'sliced digit' - but it's not an error.....
V's
No - There's mechanical doubling on the reverse.
Looks like it could be 1. Rolled Thin planchet - check the weight, in grams or grains. 2. Weakly struck - is the reeded edge full, or weakly...
Damaged - not an error of any kind, I'm sorry to say.
Numismatic Pareidolia - The only cure is studying the Minting Process, and knowing what circulation-strike coins look like, from different years...
I've seen thousands of Çopper coated Off Center Zinc Cents that do not show the zinc core. Some do, some don't - depends on the Mint, the Press...
It's a 'counterpunch' - Someone punched the '7' into the coin. See the flattened area on the obverse. Definitely PMD
as above, all damage on that nickel.
Separate names with a comma.
