If you buy three at a time my local dealer sells Morgans for $32 and Peace for $30 in F to VF condition.
This is one of the most interesting errors I have, all pictures ore of the same bill: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
You don;t see the front THROUGH the back. You see the front printed backwards ON the back.
Not a true binary, not a radar, not a repeater... your point is?
I would keep it. You just don't come across three digit low numbers that often...if ever.
Looks like a die scratch/gouge to me. Just does not seem to be as sharp as I would expect if it were a die crack. I would also expect that...
My sister was born in 1939 and she looks better than that nickel.
And that is only a partial transfer. Well graded error notes go for good money. And star note errors go for even better money.
OK, thanks for that trick. Now watch eBay for an influx of wet ink transfer errors!
I do not understand what you are trying to say/explain.
If I find a wheat cent in AU condition I will keep it. Otherwise I can find many well circulated wheat cents in every box of cents I go through....
Your first picture is not very good, but it looks like a wet ink transfer. This happens when a sheet does not feed properly and the ink is...
I stand corrected. There is no use in collecting bills outside this range and expect to get a match.
Hey, I have one of those! Also have a $20 solid star. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
A few of my star note errors: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Low third printing [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Crooked third printing [ATTACH] Insufficient ink first printing [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Sorry Bentley, your posts hurt my eyes. Just can’t stand reading them anymore. Hope you continue your enthusiasm though!
I thought cud’s had to be rim to rim. Aren’t these just considered die chips?
OK, thanks.
Could the stain have come from an improperly washed planchet?
Separate names with a comma.
