I tend to think that there are error collectors out there that may disagree with your dealer! Nice Proof error!
Most if not all 1981s proof sets were "Either" type1 or type2. By the pics shown, you have a type1 set. If you look closely at the S mintmarks,...
I went out this evening for about ans hour and a half, turned my discriminator down some (more metal find) and found 29cents. I 96' qtr, 3...
These do not look like the Type 2 to me. The type 2 will have a more flatter top than the pointed top that you are showing. These are different...
I myself use a Garrett1500. I like this detector. Has great discriminators and imaging. They usually sell for about $800 new and I was fortunate...
I have found nothing but modern junk with mine. One wheat penny once but nothing fantastic. Of course it's hard to find good places to hunt...
I received an email also that mine shipped. 1 prf & 1 unc.
Here's a link where you can, I guess, purchase these. I guess these are the same thing you are questioning???...
I use Numismedia also and of course ebay prices for real market prices.
Well I came in late but I'll add my 2cents also. I tend to agree with everyone else. the 1903 looks to have been polished. Looks genuine to me and...
If you've not seen an NGC registry set, the coins have a little eyeball out to the right side of the coin row. That indicates a picture. All the...
Thanks Treashunt! I really didn't even take the time to think about it that way. duh!!
I'm thinking the lincoln is a ty2 but none of the others that I'm able to tell.
I thought this was kind of cool. I bought a 1962 Bluebook handbook of coins and found this article in it. I wished it would have had the date of...
Very nice looking Morgan. I'm gonna go with MS63 due to some scarpes on Liberty and what looks like some hazing on the Rev.
I prefer to try for the DCAMs. I have an almost complete registry at NGC. I'm a low budgeted collector so there are better coins if you can afford...
I noticed your post about the Red Books. I never paid attention to my 63' redbook. It has this duplicate page. It actually goes 239 flipside 238,...
I have this 1963 edition. It actually pages out as 239 (backside is 238), then 239 again (backside 240)
Welcome to the forum. I agree with the EF (xf) opinions also. Of course better pics will help. It looks to have some nice feather details. That...
I have a small collection of them going back to 63' with a few missing here and there. About the only one's that are hard to get would be the 1st...
Separate names with a comma.
