I firmly do believe 2487/88s do belong to Barypous. The image fits very well with his description. Fortunately those are plentiful, so if they do...
Maybe double since it's better condition. [ATTACH]
Not what I was expecting, but this is better!
As Victor said, rare and collectable were exempt. They gave $20 I believe, after the confiscation it immediately went to $35.
Am I correct that this is year 20? [ATTACH] Aretas IV Mint: Petra AR Drachm RY 20 to 29, 11 to 20 AD Obvs: Laureate head of Aretas right. Revs:...
I took that photo in 2006. A few stray finds were found with a detector, but most of these were several feet deep as bodies most likely fell into...
No. That is from museum display case.
Not mine... But found there [ATTACH]
No question the OP is a replica.
Amusing they use 1907 as the stimulus to create fractional reserve banking.
I wonder what happened in 1913 to do this :bored: [ATTACH]
It's wrong. Just look at any of the images on the page [ATTACH]
1785 is ΘEOΠATOPOΣ not ΘEOY.
If dated the only possibility is ΓΞP which is year 163 (150/149 BC). That is the first 3 in the exergue, otherwise there are combinations of 1 or...
Most likely Antioch for which there are dozens of combinations. Will need the control to know the exact date and reference #.
Yes sounds like Alexander I. Would also need to know the controls to narrow down which of the 5 mints it belongs to.
What does the inscription say?
Is this coin in your possession and is it silver?
The image is too blurry, but this will help narrow it down. Click on Denomination ▼ to sort by AE.
The non-Roman that made that would be laughing at this news of their imitation right now :D
Separate names with a comma.
