Looks like a jewelry trinket off a charm bracelet. I expect it might’ve once had a loop mounted at the top. I suppose it could alternately be a...
Click the pic, read the (easy) instructions, and come enter! [ATTACH]
Since @Abramthegreat hasn't done the Round 4 drawing, y'all want me to step back in and do it?
@Eric Babula - got it yet?
Love it. Sharp strike, nice color! If you ever tire of that one, it could come live with me! ;) In 48 years of collecting, the highest graded...
LordM Giveaway #126 (pick your prize) Contest status: OPEN Drawing: pending; on or after 1 August 2025 Winner: pending Shipping status: pending...
It is time to draw the second winner. This time our lucky number was #47. [ATTACH] Post #47 was by... @NonFloreatExxon ! Coingratulations,...
Looks real enough to me- just harshly cleaned.
It is time for the drawings! Now, for the first drawing, our lucky number was #27. [ATTACH] And Post #27 was by... @No_Ragrets !...
Yes.
:nailbiting:
Y’all don’t forget Rule 3 in the instructions… a lot of folks have. You not only pick a prize, but have to say WHY you chose it. (Unless you’re...
Here’s the “black beauty” example I used to own. Too dark for some folks’ taste perhaps, but I liked it, due to the CircCam contrast. [ATTACH]
Is that old small ANACS? Looks better than 61.
Merged the duplicate threads into one.
That thing looks positively prooflike. On an aureus. Wow. @princeofwaldo - that’s an amazing huge Farouk!
The French one is a proof. Like you, I dunno what the other is- I suspect 19th century India. Perhaps someone here will pin it down.
I like it! If memory serves correctly, my first slabbed Feuchtwanger was an XF45, like yours. Then I upgraded to this one... [IMG] ... which...
She's been around the block a few times, but hey, the price was right, eh? ;)
Another definite contender!
Separate names with a comma.
