I said that one was fairly obvious. The style is just wrong
My (clipped) example I got pretty cheaply: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Neat choice of imagery for that coin. I like the cart
His whole treatment of the situation is nothing short of pathetic. If I had any thoughts about buying from him before, they are nonexistent now....
I am NOT back pedaling. You obviously did not read my posts. My original comment was in response to you deflecting all possible blame for PCGS’...
The three graders grading and authenticating the coins are not the ones who pull out the references. They have specialists who do the variety...
I want it to be known that I do not think that slabbing this (fake) coin makes PCGS a whole bunch of incompetent hooligans. My point is only that...
I think I might see some active corrosion on the upper left wheat ear. Otherwise, MS-62/3 BN
There’s nothing to restore. It’s just moderate toning.
The people who look at the coin to assign the grade are not the same ones who attribute the variety. What part of that do you not understand? I’m...
Careful, you might be allergic to that stuff
They don’t, but it’s irrelevant. Their grading/authentication experts, who are decoupled from the variety attribution process, called it authentic.
They had the coin in hand. They had at least three experts to grade the coin (who don’t even do the variety attributions) at their disposal who...
Nice deflection of PCGS’ mistake.
The style on all of them is bad. All Aliexpress fakes
There were a bunch of heavy contact marks that put my technical grade at 63, but I figured it got the good ol eye appeal bump
Not a proof. Pretty coin. MS-64 BN.
Separate names with a comma.
