The surfaces and appearance of that coin are like nothing I’ve ever seen before. I say MS63 just because it’s pretty clean.
I would be proud to have this coin in my album collection. It’s a beauty!
Based on your photos, I would grade that coin MS64
That’s a nice coin in general. Strong strike, nice luster, decent surfaces, and the die crack is very cool. I’ve never seen a crack that big on...
So I gotta post them in the Toning Premium thread?
Wanna guess the purchase price of #1 & #2 Jason?
4 days left to get your votes in guys.
Oh boy, this brings back my memories of arguing with Doug about the difference between circulation wear and roll/stacking/cabinet friction. He...
Based on this submission, I would say they were harsh in their grading. The problem is that I submitted less than 50 coins and that is nowhere...
I have never seen a full step 1954-S Jefferson Nickel. The 54-S is notoriously the worst struck of the entire series but they are still much...
$50
Given the condition of that coin, I would highly suspect that you have die deterioration doubling instead of a doubled die.
Based on the marks on Monticello, the coin should be MS66 and that was the grade I was expecting. That said, I have no idea what they did to...
You gonna guess the purchase prices?
I was expecting at least MS66+ on this one. Disappointment was par for the course in my latest submission. [img]
The coin has incomplete strike which is design related. I see no friction at all in the fields so the coin is mint state. The coin says gem to...
I was expecting MS66 or MS66+ on this one. Ok @Razz, what did you see that nobody else saw? [img]
I did that, I didn't see anything that would cause a net grade. I will look again.
It seems that everyone had reservations about the toning on the coin, but were reluctant to details grade the coin so they simply net graded...
I was expecting (hoping) for MS65* for this coin, their grade is just confounding. Maybe @Ana Silverbell can explain the grade. [IMG]
Separate names with a comma.
