Hits and marks do not disqualify a coin from MS
I’m talking about the marks and the like
I meant to say: The coin was easy enough to see in the other pics. The SLAB was not
I use 1776 dollar (2/3, half, 1/3, 1/6, one sixth, 1/2, third) on eBay. There’s one for $99.99 right now.
The coin was easy enough to see in the other pics. The coin was not
Good luster, LOTS of chatter. The bright white suggests it has been dipped. 63. No higher. 62 is entirely possible.
Can’t afford one of the Continental Dollars? Get one of these instead! This cost me a little under $120. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I like this one better at 63. It might go RB
Maybe that’s why they want a 100-point scale, so that they can raise the grade ceiling :troll::troll::troll:
@C-B-D do some buffalo nickel GTGs and see how quickly the pitchforks come out! :D
https://www.ebay.com/itm/KEY-DATE-1926-S-BUFFALO-NICKEL-NGC-XF-45-Excellent-PCGS-BV-1150-No-Reserve-NR/283563127889?hash=item4205adf451:g:lggAAOSwD...
Can you post a pic of the reverse? I did not get a 100% good feeling on authenticity. There’s a particular thing I am looking for and it is on the...
That net grade is value grading, plain and simple. Just like the toning bumps for high-end coins. The sharpness grade is technical grade.
What is the weight?
I’ve heard estimates that about 1% of the US population currently collects coins to some degree. This includes stackers, coin roll hunters, and...
If between 1 and 10 people out of every 1000 from my generation pick up collecting coins at some point in their life, the hobby will be fine. Many...
I look there, but I check for breaks in the luster. I simply could not tell on this coin.
Because it is nothing more than a hyped-up fad
Both of these graded MS-63. HUGE difference in quality. I rest my case. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] I guess we can change the fighting topic to the blatant...
I initially thought this was a 62, and the number and severity of the obverse marks amended my guess downward. 63 is too high for this coin
Separate names with a comma.
