MS65 PL
let’s put it this way, the members of this forum are far more conservative than NGC and they went 12 to 5 in favor of 5 full steps.
Definite beaner
The more prominent nick only cuts the steps between the 5th and 6th steps, which don't count. The smaller nick is too shallow to cut all the way...
1943-S Jefferson War Nickel Premium GEM BU $11 [IMG] [IMG] Not full steps, but still nice step detail.
I've collected Jefferson Nickels for a long time, and I've seen hundreds of 50-Ds. This coin is one of the absolute best I have ever seen and has...
Take it from someone who has posted a ton of GTG threads, people expect either a slab photo or at least a label photo for the reveal. And I so...
That is a very attractive coin. Your set looks tremendous as a matched set. I remember when you started this set and I was skeptical about the...
Now this one was graded by PCGS and the slab sustained some fire damage so I cracked it out. I don't think this coin has any shot at MS66 FS so I...
Okay guys, I was playing a little trick on all of you. I posted this exact coin back in October, and I haven't submitted it yet because I was...
Remember when I said it was attractive? It’s not that attractive!
I say AT, but it is still attractive.
If you got more light on the coin in your photos, I may have gone for the + grade. That coin is a beast with a super clean obverse.
I can’t go gem with that scratch on the cheek MS64*
The OPs coin looks like it was graded by Stevie Wonder. From the photographs shown, it is clearly not full bands. I have no problem with your...
I’m a little surprised how many people thought the coin missed full steps. The only real area of concern is the 3rd & 4th steps below the 2nd...
That 25-S looks net graded, but I can’t tell what for, the luster looks fine, and the coin doesn’t have an over dipped look. Strange
That’s gorgeous MS66
MS64*
[IMG]
Separate names with a comma.
