This is a counterfeit. From my in-hand examination of an example, there should be scratches on the obverse behind the head on the genuine host...
I had the 1821 at VF-20 and the 1831 at VF-25, but both are just barely there.
Merry Christmas everyone! I agree! [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I agree. 66
It is an obvious and recurring situation. The coin is genuine. The seller is accepting far less than what it is worth, meaning he is not really...
The die variety is BB-65. It appears to be certified by NGC in an old holder with a solid insert. The scammer cleverly cropped out the full slab...
The coin is real. The pictures were stolen. Let me try to find the source
I believe this to be a low-end 65. It is very clean and well-struck
I can’t tell if the marks in front of the face are spots or not. If they are, easy 65 RD. If not, 64 RD
Very interesting! Definitely adding that trick to the arsenal. Well done! I agree.
Fingers are an abrasive. When a coin circulates, it gets hairlines. These tend to tone over and disappear until the surfaces are dipped....
These look like genuine well-worn Morgans. The rest don’t even look silver. [ATTACH]
The two Morgans look probably genuine
concur
Great coin. I was looking for an example like this. I’ve seen two examples, but one was too expensive, and the other sold before I had a chance...
This sounds like one of those mad libs where you fill in the blanks with humorous words. “I once had a (ghost chili). What I did was (shove it)...
did you cherrypick that 1942/41 D?
Incredible year! I really like all of them! i am a proud bottom feeder. Welcome to the club. :)
I’m a huge fan of the luster on 1914 and 1915 issues [ATTACH]
Wow. I got charged a €20 for a €2000 auction win from another auction house.
Separate names with a comma.
