Oops my bad op. Yes that's a 1999 d Cam. But it's the WAM you are looking for.
.
wow
no such thing as a CAM 1999d
@joseph eason looks like a WAM but looks lie split plate doubling on the date.
+1 environmental damage
Here is a 1963 Canadian cent that I got in change today that peaked my curiosity. I don't know if it is a slight off center, a broadstrike or what...
and I can assure that
I am no way at fault...it is just Iraqi Dinar. He has never served in the military.
no he was not.
I guess in a way clad coins are plated but when I read plating blisters it just made me think of those nasty zincolns with the bubbles all over...
Hey all I want to say this is my first time ever loading pics from my phone as I just got one capable of doing so recently and still learning. I...
correct me if i'm wrong but quarters are clad not plated o_O it kind of looks like die scrapes...not entirely sure...
:p
not bad for 49 years of circulation.
ok im going to a deduction reasoning on this the acid/wear wore the design which is obviously worn down but left enough that the thickness is...
would me as well but the thickness throws me off.
Nice find!
So while I was out today I got this in change. I have a feeling someone might say acid dip but could just plain old wear take this much weight off...
negative, looks like plating issues which is common. Keep looking.
Separate names with a comma.
