Yes, you are correct. I had written the wrong part of the clash.
Looks to be the result of a clashed die. This is opposite E PLURIBUS UNUM and it is not uncommon to find traces of the motto in front of the...
The coin is heavily circulated and shows evidence of having been buffed/cleaned. It is worth its weight in melt value, but do not expect to get...
I like it and think it pretty cool. If I had seen something like that for a few dollars I also may have purchased it.
Minimum premium over melt? Welcome to China, my friend!
I would not buy that piece.
They are a privately minted one-tenth (or perhaps one-quarter) ounce silver round. They are worth their melt content to me.
I hadn't even noticed that you previously wrote it was PL. D'OH!:o I had mentioned it might be PL because I have owned several 1946-S and 1947-S...
Here are a few from non-Mint Set years. These are quite a bit tougher to find nicely toned than those coins from 1947-1958, exclusive of 1950....
TexasJarhead, it looks like your 1946-S has a PL obverse.
A clashed die is not considered an error.
I love these sets and your is especially beautiful. The old Whitman Classic albums created some terrific coins.
Separate names with a comma.